26 Nis The best interpretation is actually you to definitely Angie try Angela Bowie by herself, having exactly who Jagger allegedly (also) carried on an affair
Angela Bowie’s revelations into Joan Streams Show led certain in order to imagine your eponymous “Angie” was not Angela, but David Bowie.
Various other preferred rumor is one “Angie” was in the Angela Richards, Keith Richards’ child of the actress Anita Pallenberg. (This is a tremendously silly rumor, as the Angela Richards are lower than a year-old whenever the fresh new Going Rocks filed “Angie.” It isn’t also possible that Mick Jagger just used the woman identity toward song’s title, as the she was to start with named Dandelion of the their parents up to she insisted with the label Angela years later.)
Hit a brick wall love facts once the conveyed inside tune lyrics just keep attention getting such a long time, however, an effective salacious rumor on the stars stepping into a homosexual coupling often live provided discover people to repeat it
- A special rumor got it that “Angie” involved Anita Pallenberg, who had flings that have each other Running Rocks participants Brian Jones and you can Mick Jagger together with a multi-12 months experience of Keith Richards.
Whenever an artist composes a tune about an unsatisfied romance which have a beneficial woman’s label getting a subject, most of us suppose it ought to was motivated from the good real-existence relationship that have somebody of that identity (especially if it turns out he understood a woman called you to definitely, no matter whom she was a student in their existence). But really this is often not true; songwriters routinely pen really works where names and you will details was chose while the they fit the new meter of your own structure. Even though the tune alone will be the catharsis out of profoundly-sensed personal angst shown because the a particular (yet , completely fictional) outpouring, otherwise could well be an authentic chronicle out-of an upsetting feel suffered with, it doesn’t fundamentally realize the gal just who empowered upwards those people thoughts in real world is given the same name about song. Autobiography simply goes up to now – if the meter isn’t proper, the name goes.
Songwriters also provide written pieces centered up to specific brands only because the they appreciated new voice of those: Buddy Holly did learn good “Peggy Sue” (brand new girlfriend from drummer Jerry Allison), however the tune was not predicated on any genuine-life romance anywhere between this lady and you can Pal. Often artists merely establish due to their audience, churning out functions one to expound upon well-known enjoy its songs-purchasing societal have a tendency to choose which have (such as for instance heartwrenching partings). To own for example offerings, new eponymous girl need not become somebody actual, given that copywriter is getting in touch with upon universal layouts into the substance out-of his song.
Yet conjecture across the title of your “Angie” regarding Moving Stone fame have long-past ceased become a keen productive matter, a quieting out of wagging tongues who’s yet , to happen to the amazing rumor, that of Mick Jagger and you will David Bowie that have sexual knowledge of each other
Is “Angie” regarding anyone person, or is title simply plucked throughout the air? We do not know. However, we do know enough on musical never to instantaneously finish that a song entitled with an effective girl’s identity function the writer had an unsatisfied experience with a female of this title.
However, while the denials are not nearly just like the interesting as hearsay, the tale you to definitely “your head Brick has also been asleep that have [Angela’s] husband” give far and wide. Angela then muddied the issue actually further together with her 1993 tell-most of the guide Backstage Seats, where she disingenuously chided the general public for whenever what she had needless to say designed to imply, whenever you are however admitting that she herself still believed just what everyone else had assumed: